Posts

Q: Elaborate the citation of Santan Financers Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Devapa A. Sarvi Another ,Bombay High Court, Dec 10, 2004 ?

Ans:  Santan Financers Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Devapa A. Sarvi Another ,Bombay High Court, Dec 10, 2004. The Bombay High Court held that the complainant was not able to discharge the primary burden of showing debt or liability and the cheque was given towards satisfaction of same. The accused has considerably shaken theory of complainant in cross- examination of its witness. The complainant was not justified in presenting the said cheque for payment and upon dishonour to initiate proceeding under section 138 of the Act. The complaint is therefore quashed.

Q: Describe the citation of Nandkishore Mehra v. Sudhir Transport Ltd.Bombay High Court, Apr 24, 2008 ?

Ans: Nandkishore Mehra v. Sudhir Transport Ltd.Bombay High Court, Apr 24, 2008. The Bombay High Court held that if there is no oral and documentary evidence by complainant about legal liability, section 138 of NI act will not be applicable and the acquittal of accused is just and proper.

Q: Elaborate the citation of Pawan Enterprises vs Satish H. Verma on 10 January, 2003 ?

Ans:  Pawan Enterprises vs Satish H. Verma on 10 January, 2003 . The Bombay High Court held that the post dated cheque was issued as security and not in discharge of any liability and amount paid in installments was not incorporated in demand notice. The order of acquittal by trial court is just and proper. x x

Q: Comment the citation of Vikash Goyal v. Vijay Kumar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Nov 10, 2014 ?

Ans: Vikash Goyal v. Vijay Kumar, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Nov 10, 2014  The honourable Punjab and Haryana High Court held that when there is contradiction in the statements of complainant and the story put-forth by complainant/applicant was doubtful, the acquittal of accused warrants no interference.

Q: What is role of principle of natural justice for the workmen ?

Ans: The principle of Natural Justice is derived from the word ‘Jus Natural’ of the Roman law and it is closely related to Common law as well as moral principles but is not codified. It is a law of nature which is not derived from any statute or constitution. The principle of natural justice is adhered to by all the citizens of civilised State with Supreme significance. In the ancient days of fair practice, at the time when industrial areas ruled with a harsh as well as rigid law to hire and fire, the Supreme court gave its command with principles of natural justice for establishment of social justice and economic statutory protection for the workmen.

Q: What are the three rules of principle of natural justice ?

Ans: The first one is “Hearing rule” which states that the person or party who is affected by the decision made by the panel of expert members should be given a fair opportunity to express his point of view to defend himself. Secondly, “Bias rule” generally expresses that panel of expert should be biased free while taking the decision. The decision should be given in a free and fair manner which can fulfil the rule of natural justice. And thirdly, “Reasoned Decision” which states that order, decision or judgement of the court which is given by the presiding authorities with a valid as well as reasonable ground.

Q: What is the principle of Natural Justice ?

Ans: Natural justice is a sense of what is wrong and what is right.