Factual Matrix-7

That the petitioner stated under section 145 of negotiable instrument act,  1881 in Affidavit: 

1. The respondent has close relationship with petitioner.  On one side, the respondent stated that he had been in close relationship with petitioner for 10 to 15 years and on the other side, the respondent told that the respondent did not know the name of mother of petitioner,  name of father of petitioner and other family members of petitioner. The respondent did not know where the petitioner lived before his marriage .

2. In para 5, line 9, the respondent accepted that he filed income tax in 2008 and after that he did not file income tax due to deterioration of financial condition whereas in affidavit he accepted that he filed last income tax return in 2005 and after that he did not file income tax return. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Q: What is the significance of issuing account payee cheque?

Ans: While issuing the cheque, a drawer should draw two parallel lines on its left side and should write 'account only' in between them. By doing this, the cheque becomes an account payee cheque and the payment will be made only in the bank account of the payee. In case of any type of fraud, the payee can be traced. Having the above- mentioned precautions, a drawer can be avoided from fraud to a great extent.
Read more

Q: How would section 208, 209 and 210 of IPC be implemented in dishonour of cheque ?

Ans: A and B collude together and A issues the cheque for X Amount, which gets dishonored.  B files the complaint under S.138, and without proving the liability gets the benefit of presumption under S.139, now both A and B enact the drama of compounding under S.147 of NI Act, matter closed, but in principle A has violated IPC S.208 and S.210 and B has violated IPC S.209. So, if rightly B is asked to prove the entitlement to become the holder, before presumption can be granted to him, surely he would fail and lawfully both A and B can be prosecuted under IPC S.208, S.209 and S.210 if required.
Read more

Q: What are the other illustrations of cheating?

Ans: Illustrations: 1. There are two persons A and Z. A exhibits the false sample of an article to Z and intentionally makes Z believe that the article corresponds with the sample. A here induces Z to buy and pay for the false sample of the article. A cheats Z. 2. A, by pledging as diamond articles which he knows are not diamonds, intentionally deceives Z, and thereby dishonestly induces Z to lend money. A cheats.
Read more