Q: What is the cogent point in Shafikkur Rahman V.
Ans: In case of Shafikkur Rahman vs The State Rep.
By on 31 March, 2022, the honourable Madras High
Court held that 1000 culprits can escape, but, one innocent person should
not be punished.
x
Q: Elaborate the citation of Union of India (UOI) and Ors Vs. Surendra Pandey, 18.09.2014 ?
Ans: Union of India (UOI) and Ors Vs. Surendra Pandey, 18.09.2014 . The Respondent on authorised leave started his homeward journey by train. While boarding a bus from Hajipur to join his family in Patna he met with an accident that resulted in a disability, assessed at 20% by the Medical Board concerned. A Court of Inquiry recorded a finding that the accident and the resultant injury suffered by the Respondent were not attributable to military service. The claim for payment of disability pension was declined by the Appellants, according to whom the Respondent was authorised to travel upto Gopalganj-his home station. Any accident involving the Respondent at Hajipur was in no way related to military service or the time requisite for completing the homeward journey which the Respondent was authorised to undertake. The Respondent approached the Armed Forces Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the disability was attributable to military service as the Respondent was on annual leave, henc...
Comments
Post a Comment